Skip to content
Mesa Project

Head to head

Pro SS 3.0VSFalcon GT

Comparing 2 of 3

Summary

Claimed figures · blanks excluded
Most peak power
Falcon GT16.8 kW
Lightest
Falcon GT150 lb68 kg
Biggest battery
Pro SS 3.03,600 Wh
Best power-to-weight
Falcon GT247 W/kg

Measured against each other

Peak power

Δ 1 kW
  • Pro SS 3.015.8 kW
  • Falcon GT16.8 kW

Power-to-weight

Δ 39 W/kg
  • Pro SS 3.0208 W/kg
  • Falcon GT247 W/kg

Battery capacity

Δ 720 Wh
  • Pro SS 3.03,600 Wh
  • Falcon GT2,880 Wh

Weight

Δ 18 lb8 kg
  • Pro SS 3.0168 lb76 kg
  • Falcon GT150 lb68 kg

Shorter is lighter.

Front travel

  • Pro SS 3.0—
  • Falcon GT—

Rear travel

  • Pro SS 3.0—
  • Falcon GT—

Full specifications

Price

Price
—
$4,399

Motor & performance

Peak power
15.8 kW21 hp
16.8 kW (best)23 hp
Rated power
6 kW8 hp
—
Power-to-weight
208 W/kgCALC
247 W/kg (best)CALC
Torque (as published)
—
—
Top speed
62 mph100 km/h
—

Battery & charging

Battery capacity
3,600 Wh (best)3.6 kWh
2,880 Wh2.88 kWhCALC
Pack voltage
72 V
72 V
Pack amp-hours
50 Ah
40 Ah
Swappable battery
Yes
—
Range claim
—
—
Charge time
3.5 h
—

Chassis

Weight
168 lb76 kg76 kg168 lb
150 lb68 kg (best)68 kg150 lb
Seat height
—
—
Ground clearance
—
—
Wheelbase
—
—
Frame
—
—

Suspension

Fork
—
—
Front travel
—
—
Shock
—
—
Rear travel
—
—

Wheels & brakes

Front wheel
—
—
Rear wheel
—
18″
Front tire
—
—
Rear tire
—
—
Front brake
—
—
Rear brake
—
—

Electronics

Ride modes
—
—
Regen braking
—
—
Display
—
—

Ownership

Warranty
—
—

Highlighted = best among these bikes, where “best” is clear-cut. Range claims and torque are never ranked, because brands measure them differently.